Why Your Data Science Notebook Will Break in Production (And How to Fix It)

Published: October 2025
By Amy Humke, Ph.D.
Founder, Critical Influence

flow

Most new data scientists start their journey in a notebook. You import, load data, clean it up, train a model, check the scores, and hit "run" whenever you feel like updating it. That's perfect for exploration. But Production is an entirely different game. A pipeline takes that same logic and turns it into something repeatable, trackable, and safe. It's the difference between saying, "I got it to work once," and "it works every day, on schedule, without breaking anything." In a production system, you can't just re-run the whole notebook when one thing changes. If you're moving your machine learning model into a pipeline for the first time, this is the simple explanation I wish I'd had on day one.

The Core Idea: Two Production Lines

iptv_bi_flow

The secret to a reliable system is the separation of duties. You need two different, distinct "notebook chains" or lines of work: one for building the model, and one for running the model daily.

1. The "Recipe Maker" Line (IPTV)

This line does the heavy lift and runs only when you need to retrain or change your model's logic.
What it is: The Input, Prepare, Transform, Validate line.
Its Job: Ingest the raw data, clean it, transform it into the final features your model uses, train the model, and validate the results.
The Output: Its main job is to create a clean, versioned feature snapshot and a whole bundle of artifacts (we'll explain those next). This becomes the one accurate reference for the production environment.
Two Critical Rules:

  1. Temporal Honesty: Features are computed only from data available up to the time of the event. No "looking ahead." If you accidentally provide the model with data from the future, it will be a genius in testing but a disaster in Production.
  2. Schema Discipline: The input and output data must stick to a predefined contract (names, types, no unexpected missing values). If the data shifts, the job must stop and alert you.

2. The "Line Cook" Line (BI)

This is the production run line, which applies the model on a scheduled basis (daily, hourly).
What it is: The Business Inference line.
Its Job: To be boring. It pulls in the newest data, loads the most recent artifact bundle from the Recipe Maker, applies the model as-is, scores the new rows, and writes a tidy record with a clear paper trail (lineage).
No Refitting! The Line Cook never adjusts the recipe. It loads the exact averages, mappings, and scaling parameters saved during training. If it had to guess, your scores would slowly drift into trouble.
Stopping is a Feature: If the new data doesn't match the quality or structure that the Recipe Maker was trained on (e.g., a required column is missing), the job should pause and send an alert. It should use the last valid score and clearly mark it. This is intentional; it protects you from publishing bad numbers.

What "Artifacts" Really Are

If your production scoring process has to "guess" anything, you will fail.
Artifacts are the model's entire memory. Think of them like a Pantry of ingredients and tools that the Line Cook must use to replicate the dish perfectly.

Everything the model depended on gets saved and versioned together:

You tag all of this with a version (e.g., model_v2.1, training_data_2025-06-01). When someone asks, "Why did the score change today?" you can point to a versioned artifact, not a memory. One place. One truth.

Treating Your Code Like King (GitHub and CI/CD)

Your system needs a backbone that enforces rules and enables safe changes. GitHub is the manual.

GitHub (or a similar version control) should be the single source of truth for all production code, configurations, and schedules. If a new teammate can't find the entry points and schedules easily, your setup is too complicated.
You should separate Development, Staging, and Production environments.

CI/CD: The Head Chef and the Pass

Continuous Integration (CI) and Continuous Delivery (CD) are your system's safety net:

Planning for Failure (Because It Always Happens)

Backfill Without Starting Over

Your data will fail. When it does, you can't afford to re-run the entire Recipe Maker for every partition since the beginning of time.

Monitoring That Triggers Action

You're not monitoring to create a nice dashboard; you're monitoring to prevent a crisis.

When drift or performance slips past a set threshold, the system should alert and, in some cases, automatically trigger the Recipe Maker (IPTV) to retrain.

The Newcomer's Mental Model

Think of your MLOps pipeline like a professional, high-volume restaurant:

Pipeline Component Restaurant Equivalent Core Function
IPTV Line The Recipe Maker (Chef) Writes the perfect recipe once; saves the exact ingredients and oven settings.
Artifacts The Pantry. Everything the kitchen needs is labeled, versioned, and on the right shelf.
BI Line The Line Cook Same dish. Same steps. Every night. Gets the ticket out on time.
CI/CD The Pass & Head Chef Checks the quality of every dish, sends back any bad plates, and updates the menu only when the test table gives the green light.
Monitoring the Post-Service Taste Test If the quality is slipping, you pull the lever to retrain the recipe.

If you maintain that separation cleanly, you achieve consistency without needing to babysit.

Tips That Save Reputations

Conclusion

Ultimately, the goal isn't to make your life harder; it's to eliminate repetitive manual work and protect the integrity of the model. By cleanly separating the Recipe Maker (IPTV) from the Line Cook (BI), you build a system that achieves consistency without needing constant human intervention. Trust in your model comes from knowing exactly what produced a score, when it was produced, and why. That is the value of moving from a notebook to a pipeline: predictable, traceable, and repeatable machine learning that actually serves the business.

← Back to Articles